Total Pageviews

Thursday, February 22, 2018

Decatur Daily Editorial

Blogger Comments:  Folks I encourage you to read the Decatur Daily editorial and let's get the message out.  Stop the sheriff that we vote into power from using an outdated law to reap the benefits of inmate food funds for themselves.  The state is pretty stingy with their money so we must believe that it takes every dime that comes into the jail to feed the inmates.  To listen to Franklin's pity party she claims she lost $40,000.00 last year that apparently came out of her pocket.  Maybe Ana should have taken money from the rodeo funds, discretionary funds, pistol permit funds or one of the many other accounts she is responsible for.

Cry me a handful Ana.

Our View

Time to solve jail-food issue

  • Updated 
http://www.decaturdaily.com/opinion/editorials/time-to-solve-jail-food-issue/article_941957ac-0975-5db7-b2b6-2f7274ac44c2.html


65 comments:

  1. Ana may not be running for re-election, but I can guarantee you that Food Fund Account will be completely empty (if not in the negative) by the time she leaves office!

    ReplyDelete
  2. Glenda, this food money taken by Ana pales in comparison to the money Harold Jefferys and his family have stolen from investors. Glenda, being the fine “whistleblower“ that you we know you are going to report the allegations in the lawsuit. C‘ MON, why would you be trying to hide these lawsuits from the public guy? Don’t make your readers speculate Glenda. After all this is a federal lawsuit filed by the bankruptcy trustee attorney, it wasn’t filed by some $.10 lawyer like Jerry Knight.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Damn, dude, if you know so much about some lawsuit that's been filed against Jeffreys, then spill the beans about it yourself. If you know all of the details, then put em out there for the rest of us to read. If there actually even is a lawsuit, that is. Exactly how much was it that Jeffreys and his family have stolen from investors? And where is the proof that it actually even happened? If cashiers checks were posted of Ana's efforts that take money from the Inmate Food Fund, then maybe you should send Glenda some documentation of all this proof you have against Jeffreys.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Damn dude, Glenda has already been sent copies of all three lawsuit. She refuses to share the information, the good news is, I hear AL.com is going to share it for everybody

    ReplyDelete
  5. Private said...
    "I hear AL.com is going to share it for everybody"

    Oh, good! Please share the link with us, just as soon as it's posted on AL.com. I can't wait to read all of the juicy details!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Everybody can read what private said, why repeat it? You must have over medicated today. Remember, take only as directed by your physician!!

      Delete
    2. Why repeat it? Why repeat what?! If Private has already said it, then why does Glenda even need to blog about it? Private being so omnipotent and trustworthy and all...

      Delete
    3. Struck a nerve, I see. Keep it up "anonymous", it's very entertaining to see Glenduh flopping like a fish.

      Delete
    4. Your thought process is intriguing. You got caught up in this debacle, I get that but how does it make sense Glenda is a part of something fraudulent and corrupt she uncovered?

      Delete
  6. I also sent the documents to Glenda. Looks like old man Jeffrey’s took some of his own money before the bankruptcy. Glenda told me to contact her when the documents were signed by a judge. I will and I expect her to post them.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The judge only signs a lawsuit when a settlement is reached. That is a far fetched way to try and protect Jeffreys you babbling moron.

      Delete
    2. Jeffreys didn’t take his own money, he ran out of money and was begging everybody in town to invest in his enterprise. Little did people know he was taking the money and spending on himself and his family. Go to pacer.com and read the lawsuits. It will reveal the true Harold Jeffreys for who he really is.

      Delete
    3. Man it sounds like you are so jealous of old man Jeffrers you could bite a nail into. Get a grip you could stroke out before you get to jail.

      Delete
    4. Jealous of a lying thug like Jeffreys? HA,HA. What I want is for Glenda to admit that Jeffreys has been sued and did wrong. She has worked so close with the Jeffreys misfits and proclaimed their innocence for so long she can’t bring herself to admit the Jeffreys are a bunch of crooks. They sent her copies of checks and paperwork when it pointed at someone else. Now it’s all quiet, so much for unbiased, fair and balanced whistleblowing.

      Delete
  7. That sounds fair.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Anonymous bringing the wood! Hey man, after these disgusting trolls are locked away, I owe you a beer or three.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Took a quick peek on Pacer, it appears the Jeffreys vs. Steenson case was terminated January 11,2018.
    What's up with that Glenduh?

    ReplyDelete
  10. Shoutout to whoever drives unit 413 and thinks traffic laws don't apply to him/her because they work in law enforcement. Ended up behind whoever it was driving up 231 this morning. Among the violations were tailgating, improper lane usage (drifted off the line on the left), and doing 70 in a 50 zone.

    I wouldn't normally complain so much but I got a ticket last year from a lying Morgan County deputy that said I hit the shoulder of the road twice which I know wasn't true.

    ReplyDelete
  11. That is the loaner car the sheriff drives. LOL

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Figures. We know how she feels about the rule of law.

      Delete
  12. I don't have a Pacer account, but it does list Maples vs Harold Jeffreys and Maples vs Ben Jeffreys. Looks like Ben got served his summons today.
    So the Jeffreys vs Steenson case was terminated and now these show up.
    Is the tide turning?
    Go ahead Glenduh, give us all the dirty details.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Nature of Suit : Fraudulent Transfer

      Delete
    2. Plus, Maples v John and Katie Klein. Harold’s daughter and son in law. The whole family stole money.

      Delete
    3. So wouldn't there be an arrest instead of a lawsuit? Honest question.

      Delete
    4. The Jeffreys arrest are coming.

      Delete
  13. Wait a minute. Didn’t Greg Steenson just sign document that he can’t get out of that he owes Jeffreys two or three million smackers? I’m just askin.

    ReplyDelete
  14. Yeah he did, then included it in bankruptcy. I am sure that was easier than clowning around with Jeffreys. Glenda reported that first thing, why won’t she report on Jeffreys?

    ReplyDelete
  15. Hmm...maybe Priceville Partners really was a Ponzi Scheme, maybe it wasn't the Sheriff that orchestrated the dirty dealings after all?

    ReplyDelete
  16. What you had at Priceville Partners was a 5 piece orchestra made up of Harold and Judy Jeffreys, Ben Jeffreys, and John and Katie Klein. The rest of the people were scapegoats that Harold had in place when the shit hit the fan. He hired himself a new accountant and a couple of attorneys to play along and make the plan work. Then go get a corrupt prosecutor (Jerry Knight) to help and his plan would come together. He just didn’t count on all of these other people showing up and raining on the Jeffreys parade.

    ReplyDelete
  17. Like the great philosopher James Hendrix said "Castles made of sand fall into the sea...eventually."

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Let me guess your pebbles are leaving you at every thought, nook, and cranny. Get some sleep buddy...be responsible for yourself first. Good Grief.

      Delete
  18. It is double pleasure to deceive the deceiver.

    ReplyDelete
  19. What's wrong Glenda? Cat got your tongue? Do you see the tide coming in?
    I bet you do.

    ReplyDelete
  20. Glenda sure is keeping quiet regarding the Jeffreys scandal. What’s wrong Glenda, could you be implicated as well? Jeffreys would throw you under the bus in a minute if it would help him. He’s not so worried about his family, just himself.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I am not trying to be rude here, but you might want to seek professional help. The last two blog posts your comments make me think your having relentless compulsive thoughts. No one in here is that invested into everything your talking about but you and maybe your friend...I mean after all it didn't provide a defense to those already in trouble or those going to be in trouble. Calm down, lawsuits happen everyday. Don't get your britches in a wad and lose sleep over it. Might I add, write a journal. That is what a good phychiatrist would tell you to do.

      Delete
  21. No way, not Glenda! She couldn't possibly know anything about this stuff, she said it herself "If you know about a crime and do nothing, you're just as guilty as the one that did it." Pure as driven snow, I tell you.

    ReplyDelete
  22. What is going on here? All these posts about Jeffreys and a lawsuit? No offense but as a reader this blog is not about Jeffreys...who ever the guy is, is it? I mean who cares (no offense.) A lawsuit is nothing compared to federal charges probably upcoming on Ana. Someone is sleeping, eating, dreaming Jeffreys. I don't know if the guy made mistakes or not, but I do know he does not hold a public office, good luck to the dude. I am more interested in what this blog is about...oh and scrap the candidate crap as well. What you "heard" what you "think" you know...I do not want to hear it. Just be respectful and vote. Quit throwing candidates under the bus because you want to act like a competitive soccer mom. It would help if everyone would act like an adult too! Quit stomping your foot like a toddler requesting everyone to listen to you, bow down to your "knowledge," and agree with you. This is why we can not have nice kids...or as the saying goes..."nice things."

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. That’s the biggest load of BS I have ever read. Glenda has bashed people on this site that have never been close to a public office. She only got interested in this moral high ground when the tables turned and a part of her staff got caught.

      Delete
    2. Glenda exposed your scheme. That's why your ramblings are just that...ramblings.

      Delete
    3. Fine job Glenda on exposing the Jeffreys for the thieves they are.

      Delete
  23. Over my first cup of coffee this morning I find we are still talking about Jeffreys and not what the sheriff has done. Can we please talk about Ana.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The problem with that, is Glenda has spun up lie after lie about Harold Jeffreys car lot and those that invested in it. It seems some actual truth is starting to leak out, hopefully everything will be known soon. The validity of this entire blog is about to be destroyed.

      Delete
    2. The validity of the blog doesn't hang on a lawsuit. Get real. I get you were an employee, arrested, or an investor who put all your eggs in one basket. Glenda uncovered the dirty dealings and you're mad. Why blame her? If there is a lawsuit against Jeffreys, which no one has won yet, his actions are his own. Jeffreys I'm guessing spoke to Glenda but most of Morgan county has too including the new York Times. Does that make them her staff too? Get a grip.

      Delete
    3. Jeffreys has done more than speak to Glenda!!!

      Delete
  24. Anonymous said...
    "The validity of this entire blog is about to be destroyed."

    Or emphatically confirmed. It all just depends on who you choose to believe. All of Ana's thugs and supporters will continue to believe every word that comes out of her filthy, lying mouth, no matter how absurd it sounds. And all the rational readers of this blog will continue to believe in the legitimacy and credibility of the whistleblower.

    ReplyDelete
  25. IgnorantAccusationsFebruary 23, 2018 at 9:14 AM

    Anonymous said...
    "She only got interested in this moral high ground when the tables turned and a part of her staff got caught."

    What "staff?" And what exactly was it they got caught doing?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Stealing you idiot, the staff includes, but not limited to Harold Jeffreys, Judy Jeffreys, and dear little Katie Klein.

      Bunch of thieves!!!!

      Delete
    2. I am not Glenda. But, I will believe it when I see arrests. Shame you will not take accountability for yourself and deal with your consequences. I am sure you're one of the few who got arrested. Who else would be so so invested in talking about a lawsuit against Jeffreys and hoping for revenge. Most people should be perplexed who read your comments. It's a big deal only to you because you got caught!

      Delete
    3. Glenda and company can’t stand it that the tables have turned and the truth is being exposed. They have lied on this blog for three years, and forced their useless opinions on everyone. Those fun days are over it looks like.

      Delete
  26. I suppose very few people believe all of what Glenda prints. Some of it is entertaining, but it is all slanted towards Glenda’s personal agenda. If she would print the truth people would take her blog more seriously, but instead she prints her agenda. (Point being: Not reporting on Jeffreys)

    She just can’t do right!!!

    ReplyDelete
  27. Filthy.Hag.Was.WrongFebruary 23, 2018 at 9:21 AM

    Hey, Filthy.Hag, just in case you were wondering, Ben did NOT get served a summons yesterday as you stated earlier. I guess your information about that is just as inaccurate as everything else you claim.

    ReplyDelete
  28. Sounds like Jeffreys is awake

    ReplyDelete
  29. Anonymous said...
    "I suppose very few people believe all of what Glenda prints. Some of it is entertaining, but it is all slanted towards Glenda’s personal agenda. If she would print the truth people would take her blog more seriously, but instead she prints her agenda. (Point being: Not reporting on Jeffreys) She just can’t do right!!!"

    Yet you still watch this blog 24/7 more closely than an air traffic controller monitors his scopes. Ironic, dontcha think?

    ReplyDelete
  30. Unhealthy ObsessionFebruary 23, 2018 at 9:28 AM

    Anonymous said...
    "Sounds like Jeffreys is awake"

    It also sounds like SOMEONE is more obsessed with Jeffreys now than they are with Glenda. I never thought I'd see the day! By the way, just in case you idiots don't know what it means, "obsession" is defined as an idea or thought that continually preoccupies or intrudes on a person's mind. Kinda like Jeffreys, Jeffreys, Jeffreys.

    ReplyDelete
  31. Look y'all, Glenda is in full deflection mode. Nice try, but you can't stop the truth anymore, it's coming, and it's gonna be fun to sit back and watch.
    Good luck

    ReplyDelete
  32. So here’s a question, it has been alleged on this very site that Harold Jefferys and Glenda are really really close. It has also been alleged that they have spent time on pecan Circle. If that’s the case, and I’m not saying it is or isn’t. The lawsuit alleges that Jeffreys bought that house with the investor money. So does that mean that Glenda benefited from the inmate food funds account? Just asking

    ReplyDelete
  33. Anonymous said...
    "So here’s a question, it has been alleged on this very site that Harold Jefferys and Glenda are really really close. It has also been alleged that they have spent time on pecan Circle. If that’s the case, and I’m not saying it is or isn’t. The lawsuit alleges that Jeffreys bought that house with the investor money. So does that mean that Glenda benefited from the inmate food funds account? Just asking"

    Thank God Ana paid those Inmate Food Funds back! I would hate to think that Glenda would not have benefitted, strictly just because of Ana's greediness.

    ReplyDelete
  34. I think that’s a question for Jerry Knight.

    ReplyDelete
  35. All this to create doubt. The blog is helping the criminals to create doubt with the comments more than expose the truth. Almost stopped reading this shit.

    ReplyDelete
  36. What does Jerry Knight have to do with any of this?!

    ReplyDelete
  37. Anonymous said...
    “What does Jerry Knight have to do with any of this?”

    Good question, Jerry Knight is the corrupt prosecutor that has opened a can of worms that the lid can’t be put back on. He is a close personal friend of Harold Jeffreys, and got sucked in with a cup of that Jeffreys kool aid. He started the investigation against Steenson before being let go at the DA’s Office. The interesting part is he was Steenson’s attorney dating back to the mid 90’s all the way 2010. I was told that by Knight himself. Steenson bought vehicles from him, and visited him at his lake home. Again Knight told me this himself. Now Knight is back in private practice and is representing Steenson’s ex wife in a case against Jeffreys and Priceville Partners. Now I have to ask you, who do you think Knight is really watching out far? Could it be Jeffreys? The Bar Association seems to want to know also.

    ReplyDelete
  38. So why does Jerry Knight no longer represent Steenson? Did they have a falling out or something? Was it over Steenson's biological son and the child support that Steenson was so far behind on? Or was it something else?

    ReplyDelete
  39. I think it’s because Steenson told him he was a piece of shit, and Knight didn’t take that very well.

    ReplyDelete
  40. Anonymous said...
    "I think it’s because Steenson told him he was a piece of shit, and Knight didn’t take that very well."

    Well, let's face it, nobody likes being called a piece of shit.

    I always just figured it went way back to some deeply-personal rivalry between Jerry Knight and Billable Barney. For whatever reason, and I may be wrong, I was under the impression that they never got along very well. Barney, as I understand it, only rubs elbows with big-wigs like his father-in-law, the former Morgan County Attorney. Or U.S. District Court Judges like his sister. Or registered sex offenders like his brother-in-law.

    Please click my name above (Ms.Understood) for more info.

    ReplyDelete