Total Pageviews

Sunday, March 5, 2017

State Legislature involvement

  This is yet another of many interesting and well done stories by the Decatur Daily.  Allen Treadaway is spoken about here a great deal.  He is a great man, a great law enforcement officer, a great supervisor and leader who I have known and looked up to for many years.  It is embarrassing that so many from all over this state and beyond are getting involved as they see the truth and reality of what has been happening here in our county.  News is traveling.  Please stay tuned!  
  The Following was a story printed on Sunday in the Decatur Daily.       
The last time a state legislator tried to amend a decades-old state law that allows most sheriffs in the state to keep money left over from feeding jail inmates, it didn’t turn out well.
“I tried to change it,” Rep. Allen Treadaway, R-Morris, said last week. “I just got run over.”
Treadaway said there have been no other attempts by the Legislature to change the law since his failed try in 2009. Legislators are shy about trying to change the law because of a potential “political battle” with sheriffs and county commissioners in their districts, Treadaway said.
The state’s sheriffs “flooded” committee meeting rooms when his bill was being considered, he said.
Morgan County Sheriff Ana Franklin and her attorney, Barney Lovelace, have denied The Decatur Daily’s request for copies of the jail’s food account. They have said the food account is Franklin’s private account.
The Southern Center for Human Rights, which was assigned by a federal judge to monitor the Morgan County Jail’s conditions and jail food account, said in a recent court filing that Franklin declined to provide detailed information about $160,000 that the center said she withdrew from the account in 2015.
Dennis Bailey, an attorney for the Alabama Press Association, said the state law allowing sheriffs to keep excess jail food money is “silent” about whether the account’s records are public records. The state’s Open Records Act does not include an exemption for jail food money, he said.
“Therefore, in my opinion the sheriff's records concerning the receipt and expenditures of funds paid for the feeding of inmates are open records under Alabama (law),” Bailey said.
Although Franklin and Lovelace claim the jail food account is Franklin’s private account, the Alabama Department of Public Accounts included the account in its last audit of the Sheriff’s Office.
The audit, which covered a 2½-year period ending May 31, 2014, showed an ending balance of $199,204.82 in the account. The Sheriff’s Office received $778,373 and spent $717,681.88 to feed inmates during the 30-month audit period, the audit showed.
Treadaway, who is a Birmingham police captain over the department’s East Precinct, said the inmate food account in the state’s counties should “absolutely” be an open record.
“It’s tax dollars, isn’t it?” he said.
Treadaway said he was shocked when he learned the state’s sheriffs could keep unspent money intended to feed jail inmates.
“At the end of the day, the sheriff’s job is to fight crime,” Treadaway said. “This is an incentive to sit in the office trying to figure out how to be benefited by tax dollars.”
A 2011 article in the Stanford Law and Policy Review by attorneys Sarah Geraghty and Melanie Velez of the Southern Center for Human Rights said Alabama’s law allowing sheriff’s to keep inmate food money “offers a perverse incentive” for sheriffs to skim money for themselves.
“Demanding that public officials account for how they spend taxpayer dollars is one of the most fundamental ways that the public can monitor government operations,” they wrote. “In Alabama, we discovered a bold effort to hide information about how sheriffs convert taxpayer money for their personal gain.”
Treadaway said he introduced his bill in reaction to former Morgan County Sheriff Greg Bartlett’s 2009 testimony in federal court that he had personally kept about $212,000 of unspent inmate food money over three years.
“My understanding is this is the only place in America where an elected official can actually pocket tax dollars that are left over,” Treadaway said.
The county commission in any county can assume responsibility for feeding jail inmates simply by adopting a resolution by a majority vote. Treadaway said that in 2009 the county commission was in charge of feeding inmates in 11 of the state’s 67 counties.
Morgan County Commission Chairman Ray Long has said the county has no interest in taking responsibility for feeding inmates.
Treadaway, who said many of the state’s sheriffs are not paid adequately, said changing the existing law would require support from the Alabama Sheriff’s Association and the Association of County Commissions of Alabama.
One part of a comprehensive overhaul of the existing law could include establishing a pay scale for sheriffs based on the county population.
Franklin’s annual salary is $68,000.
Limestone County Sheriff Mike Blakely gave up pocketing unspent food money in 2010 when the Legislature passed a local law tying his salary to the highest paid circuit court judge in the county. Money in the food account when he leaves office will be there for the next sheriff, he said recently.
The Southern Center for Human Rights recently filed a motion in federal court for Franklin to show why she should not be held in contempt for not complying with a 2009 amended court decree that requires all money received by the Morgan County sheriff to feed inmates be used exclusively for that purpose.
The center, as well as the now-retired judge who signed the decree, claim the order prevents Franklin from relying on the state law that allows other sheriffs to keep unspent inmate food money.
keith.clines@decaturdaily.com or 256-340-2438. Twitter @DD_KeithClines

3 comments:

  1. If it looks like a duck, quacks like a duck...etc, you get my point. We all know why franklin played account jumping with the inmate food money. It wasn't because of bargain shopping, as one comment suggested on Facebook. The first red flag was when Ana was elected. She was upset with Bartlett for leaving her ONLY an est. $180,000 in discretionary funds. I mean good grief, cry me a river. Even with what was left over, I still don't see anything you've done in 6 years, well, except blow smoke. Whistleblower you did give her an advantage...as soon as you were talking and showing proof of where those funds REALLY were allocated, she was on the move saving her A$$. Next time give her no warning. Yes, I have to certainly agree with the "fingerprint" expert who commented in a prior post, however, that only works to a certain degree. Egotism gets you no where, because you certainly didn't list my name. Ana, one more for you...why does your family agree that you're as dirty as you look? Is it the possibility they've seen some things or have been threatened?!?!

    ReplyDelete
  2. Additionally, state legislation should be involved with inmate food money. Because when you get someone in office that only makes $68,000 yearly and seems to accrue more assets or material then the president, it is in my opinion, money hungry, especially in desperate means or in greed. The simple truth is, that unfortunately, allowing a sheriff to keep "left over" monies, breeds corruption.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Allow state legislation to get involved. When a sheriff who is elected and doesn't have a pot to pi$$ in or a window to throw it out of...makes $68,000 yearly, but shows signs of assets, materialistic items, waving fliers...be it rodeo or gym membership...there is a problem, especially when said sheriff does such things habitually. As the "fingerprint" bandit expressed, it's about habits, and Ana has quite a few, that lead to money and covering her butt. Yes, let state legislation get involved, due to the fact that, such easy acquired money leads to the breeding of corruption.

    ReplyDelete